“Logic jump” was a main topic in my Class “Business Logics and Team Consensus” at Yokohama National University today.
Many people make mistakes when they develop a logic (or simply to say, message).
You may skip some necessary explanations or assumption you make, which causes misunderstanding and mis-communication.
They are simply explained in the following two cases:
CASE 1 is generally called “Deductive method”.
In your daily conversation, you may never clearly mention any principles, rules which are already known by anybody and are called a”Major premise”.
But what if the major premise is wrong or not the same as other people……??
Sometimes it is a powerful method to clarify the gap of the premises with others so that you make your message.conclusion more reasonable, convincing and logical.
CASE 2 is a common pitfall of skipping some layers of the logic (logic jump).
You may need to fill the gap between a conclusion and reason(s) so that other people can understand how you reach the conclusion. In many cases you may know how you reach it but others may not. By clarifying the “missing” layers, you can reinforce your story/logic significantly.
Here are some exercise, our students tackled as a team in my class:
There is not a single “right” answer but it is quite important to think what are missing and how you can strengthen your logic.
The teams competed with one another in the class and enjoyed the competition so much!
Keep on studying hard!